Action Not Dependent on the Motive Force of Desire

It is a major axiom for the practitioner of Karma Yoga in particular that the seeker must loosen the attachment to the fruit of works and the impulsion of desire as the motive force of action. And while this is certainly true, Sri Aurobindo points out that the formulation is too simplistic in several ways. First, even in the ordinary life in the world, while desire is certainly a strong impeller to action, it does not constitute the entire mechanism of what drives an individual to carry out any particular work or action. “The major part of the work done in the universe is accomplished without any interference of desire; it proceeds by the calm necessity and spontaneous law of Nature. Even man constantly does work of various kinds by a spontaneous impulse, intuition, instinct or acts in obedience to a natural necessity and law of forces without either mental planning or the urge of a conscious vital volition or emotional desire. Often enough his act is contrary to his intention or his desire; it proceeds out of him in subjection to a need or compulsion, in submission to an impulse, in obedience to a force in him that pushes for self-expression or in conscious pursuance of a higher principle. Desire is an additional lure to which Nature has given a great part in the life of animated beings in order to produce a certain kind of rajasic action necessary for her intermediate ends; but it is not her sole or even her chief engine….It helps us to rise out of inertia, it contradicts many tamasic forces which would otherwise inhibit action.”

Understanding the partial role of desire, even for the ordinary actions of life, is a key to responding to the objection that arises in the practice of Karma Yoga that without desire there can be no call to action and thus, no “work to be done” by the advanced practitioner.

From the side of the practitioner who has systematically cultivated the yogic standpoint, action takes on a new motive force; namely, the carrying out of the action of the Divine. “Others are obliged to obey a personal choice or motive, but he has to learn to act with an impersonal or a universal mind or as a part or an instrument of an infinite Person. A calm indifference, a joyful impartiality or a blissful response to a divine Force, whatever its dictate, is the condition of his doing any effective work or undertaking any worth-while action. Not desire, not attachment must drive him, but a Will that stirs in a divine peace, a Knowledge that moves from the transcendent Light, a glad Impulse that is a force from the supreme Ananda.”

Sri Aurobindo, The Synthesis of Yoga, Part One: The Yoga of Divine Works, Chapter 12, The Divine Work, pp. 254-255

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Action Not Dependent on the Motive Force of Desire

  1. I would suggest to you understand the topic better before writing articles. Sri Aurobindo completely supports the view that action should be done without attachment to the fruit or the activity itself. The fact that majority of work is done otherwise does not mean that the disciple of Integral Yoga should follow the common way. On the contrary, Karma Yoga describes the correct way to act according to Sri Aurobindo.

    • I am not sure you captured the sense of what was written in the specific section of Synthesis of Yoga within which the reading and quotations were contained. Neither i nor Sri Aurobindo said anything that contradicts that action should be done without desire for the fruit or the activity itself; however, Sri Aurobindo points out in the section of the Synthesis of Yoga quoted that this is NOT ENOUGH, and the integral yoga requires the disciple to go BEYOND just “non attachment to work and the fruit of work”. We are studying the Synthesis of Yoga SYSTEMATICALLY page by page and taking up each issue as Sri Aurobindo raises it. There are many levels of understanding that come with this and requires in some cases going through the entire discussion in order to pick up the complete sense. If you had reviewed the earlier posts in this section on Karma Yoga you would have seen that the points you raise were extensively covered, as well as in the comprehensive review we did of the Essays on the Gita previously.

      • In fact, even in the very article you objected to, it was pointed out that “this is certainly true” about not acting out of desire for the fruits, etc. That was a preliminary qualification before entering into the specific area that Sri Aurobindo was addressing in the passage at this point!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s