OM: The Mystic Sound of the Brahman

Sri Aurobindo translates Katha Upanishad, First Cycle: Second Chapter, Verses 15-17:  “Yama speaks: ‘The seat and goal that all the Vedas glorify and which all austerities declare, for the desire of which men practice holy living, of That will I tell thee in brief compass.  OM is that goal, O Nachiketas.  For this Syllable is Brahman, this Syllable is the Most High: this Syllable if one know, whatsoever one shall desire, it is his.  This support is the best, this support is the highest, knowing this support one grows great in the world of the Brahman.’ ”

The Katha Upanishad, in 3 verses, takes up the significance of the mystic syllable OM.  This is a very abbreviated treatment compared to the more extensive one in the Mandukya Upanishad.

OM, or AUM is declared to be Brahman.  Some commentators note that it is the “sound of the universe”, the combined sound that all creation makes.  The physical senses and the mind work to separate and distinguish individual sounds and in so doing, they do not attend to the harmony of the combined sound and vibratory impulse of the entire created universe.  Recitation of OM brings about a state of quiescence of the mind that allows a wider and deeper knowledge to take root and grow in the being.

It is more than a symbol of the Brahman, it is the “sound-body” of the Brahman.  By meditating on the syllable OM, one aligns oneself with the Brahman and with the creation.  The letters A U M are said to relate to the 3 states of waking, dream and dreamless sleep consciousness, and combined together to Turiya, the transcendent consciousness that encompasses all.  The three states  represent the awareness of the soul, not simply states of the physical being.

When the seeker recites this Mantra, the being is brought to a state of peaceful yet concentrated awareness in alignment with the consciousness of Brahman, leading to a state of “knowledge by identity”.  This is the underlying meaning of the term Brahmacharya, action that aligns with the consciousness of the Brahman.  It implies the absence of egoistic desire.  It is in the state of pure conscious awareness manifesting the entire universal creation, yet not seeking any specific individual fruit or result, that is created by and represented by the syllable OM.  When one absorbs the vibration of OM in one’s awareness, one approaches and eventually one becomes one with the Brahman.

An experiment using kirlian photography some years ago showed “before and after” effects of chanting OM.  The energy radiating out of the fingertips of the subject was dramatically enhanced through chanting of this Mantra compared to the “before” images.  The energy alignment the seeker experiences can be clearly recorded by external instrumentation.  Peace, harmony and balance result from chanting OM.

Sri Aurobindo, The Upanishads, Katha Upanishad, pp. 213-241, and Kapali Sastry, Lights on the Upanishads, pp.  104-129

1 thought on “OM: The Mystic Sound of the Brahman

  1. A little wary of Kirlian photography, but fairly intrigued by current research into the effects of meditation and mindfulness, even if too heavily focussed on the brain alone and their “therapeutic effects” (in a physical sense only) at the moment.

    The idea that science is “catching up” is a familiar one, though I tend to think of it more these days as returning from a brief detour into the cul-de-sac of the Newtonian-Cartesian “worldview” to once again engage in dialogue with practitioners of its fellow disciplines — a process most everyone is describing as the establishment of an “ecological” worldview and civilization, though I prefer the terms cosmological or ecocosmological as they seem to include the aspects of both spiritual “sight” and “hearing”. [Matthew 13:13-16]

    We hear much about the “Androgyne” or marriage of the Sacred Masculine and Sacred Feminine these days, but it seems to me there is no more room in the dawning “New Era” for feminine, spiritual sensibilities than there is in the waning “old.” I, at least, have noticed a remarkable affinity for male thinkers on the subject in the West, while their female contemporaries have remained largely unseen, ignored and unacknowledged (though this may be beginning to change) which, of course, was not the case with Sri Aurobindo and Mirra Alfassa, who seems to me to have been spiritually oriented more by “sound” while Aurobindo was spiritually oriented more by “sight.” (Perhaps why she and Aurobindo complemented each other so well?)

    This is just an impression of the two I’ve no idea how to articulate so as to be properly understood, but I imagine “the Mother” would have found resonance with Rosenstock’s “twelve tones of the spirit,” for example, moreso than his “fourfold logic” while Aurobindo would have found Rosenstock’s logic more compelling, though both are necessary to complete the picture Rosenstock was painting, as it were.

    Excellent post, as always.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.